Friday, August 18, 2023

Spellbinding biography by a scholar of blazing genius

 Devoney Looser, known for her scholarship on Jane Austen and other ‘strong women’ of the long 18th century, has crafted a detailed and lengthy biography of two fascinating and mostly unknown women - Jane and Anna Maria Porter. While they lived, and afterward, in the late 18th and early-mid 19th century, they were famous novelists. After years of research, combing through stacks and stacks of largely illegible letters, finding and digesting other documents, books, and articles, Looser has compiled not just a biography, but a fascinating tale of two women who were prolific novelists and innovators in the novel form, despite being manipulated by other women, betrayed and led on by many men in their lives, let down by brothers, and at the door of poverty for most of their adult lives.


Who should read this book? Everyone! The book is for all who…

  • love to read about strong women
  • love a twist in the tale
  • love biography that reads like fiction
  • are scholars and professors
  • are librarians
  • are feminists
  • love Jane Austen

Let’s talk about some of the dominant themes of the book. Debt. Almost everyone is in debt and often for most of their adult lives. The two sister novelists, Jane and Maria, are in and out of debt, but mostly in. They write because they love to write, but also because they need to make a living, to pay for their home, the coal that heats it, the clothes they wear, travels to visit friends, their brothers’ debts! Their brothers were often in debt, and sometimes had to leave the country to avoid debtor’s prison. What surprised me was how poorly most people managed their money, especially the men, including Sir Walter Scott! Wow! His writing was phenomenal but his debts were astronomical!

Another consistent theme is manipulation and abuse. Both Jane and Maria are manipulated by men—royalty, actors, brothers. They were led on, mistreated, and even fondled (by women and men!). They ‘hoped’ that a certain personage would leave them a bequest, or a pension, or just loan them some money, and only a few did. The two men who treated them the best, in my opinion, were their two publishers, Longman and Rees. They gave both Jane and Maria advances and went out of their way to be encouraging and helpful, to the extent they could. 

Sex outside of marriage is another theme. Many of the men in the book, and some women, were known for engaging in sex with someone other than their spouses. I learned that adultery was referred to as “criminal conversation” or crim. con. for short, and was punishable with a prison term. For once, only the man was charged (in this case), not the woman, who was cheating on her husband. Royals and commoners alike engaged in extramarital sex, a well-known secret.

“Wow!” I exclaimed aloud as I read page 412. I learned that Harriet Jacobs, whose slave narrative I teach in World Literature 1650-present, raised the child of N.P. Willis (alias Mr. Bruce in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl). Nathanial Parker Willis became a close friend and confidante of Jane Porter in her later life. Looser also refers to the Porters sisters’ time with the Volkonsky family and their cousins, the Tolstoys—related to the future novelist (whom I also teach in World Literature!).

One of the reasons I was drawn to and riveted by the book is its time period and setting. My historical novel Remnant is set against the same British backdrop—An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833. More good news on Remnant soon!

I could go on, but I’ll stop here so you can go out and buy the book or get it at a local library and start reading! You won’t be disappointed.

Monday, July 31, 2023

Riveting Plots - Part I

I have read two wonderful, unputdownable books recently. They don’t have much in common, other than brilliant female authors, unforgettable characters, and riveting plots! After I finished the second book I reflected on what made these two books great—the plots. Writers and writing teachers have produced thousands of tomes on how to write a good book. But the art and science of teaching creative writing can be traced to Aristotle, who in the fourth century BCE proclaimed a unified plot should include a beginning, middle, and end, cause and effect, and a resolution of the conflict or crisis.  

Madison Smartt Bell, in his book Narrative Design, argues that “to teach creative writing or to be taught it, is a paradox” and “fiction workshops are inherently almost incapable of recognizing success” (Bell 3, 6). However, he states this in a book purporting to teach aspiring writers! Bell believes that “form is where it’s at” (18). He defines form in several ways: “underlying structure”; “form is what reveals the intended total effect”; “the form of a work is its skeleton”; “the pattern of its assembly”; “overall design” (Bell). I’ll look at both plot and form as I examine these books. 

In Someone Else’s Shoes, Jojo Moyes introduces two female characters who appear to be quite different. One is young, beautiful, and wealthy. The other is middle-aged, somewhat frumpy, unappreciated, and harassed at work. They do have one thing in common—the gym. After the older woman accidentally takes the younger woman’s gym bag—the inciting incident—the fun begins.

In a series of just-misses and mishaps, the two women are each embroiled in their own conflicts and dramas. Nisha Cantor’s husband has locked her out and wants to divorce her, leaving Nisha with nothing—no clothes, no money, no ID, and no shoes! Sam’s husband is depressed after the death of his father, and we don’t learn until the end the real reason for the trauma. Nisha doesn’t have a job and Sam is unappreciated and undervalued at work, but when Sam wears the Christian Louboutin red crocodile shoes she discovers in the gym bag she took (thinking it was hers), she experiences a boost of self-confidence and sexiness.

What makes the plot riveting?

  • an unlikely pairing of characters
  • strong minor characters
  • woman power
  • original plot
  • two very different points of view
  • plot twists - what about those shoes is so valuable?
  • character growth - both the main characters and others
  • humor
  • realistic dialogue

Moyes pulls the reader in and makes us care about her characters, as she does brilliantly in all her books. I wanted to get to the end to find out the outcome of the shoes and the characters! I laughed, I cried, I sped up and read faster, I slowed down to catch every word.

The backbone of the book, the underlying structure, in my view, is the ability of women to forge a space for themselves in the world together. Nisha and Sam go from enemies to friends, thrown together by a pair of shoes. Strong women are even stronger together. That’s the backbone of the book.. and I loved it! 



Tuesday, July 12, 2022

Jugaad - during my Fulbright in India

 


At our second meeting of the Jane Austen Book Club (JABC) I wanted to make scones. I thought the British tradition might transport us to Jane Austen’s time. However, I lacked several ingredients and tools needed to make scones. I don’t have an oven; I couldn’t get white flour, and vanilla extract is prohibitively expensive. So I “made do.” I’ve been doing that a lot during the past two months in India. One of the young ladies in the JABC informed me that “making do” is a very Indian proposition — so much so that there is a word for it— jugaad. Jugaad means making do. Jugaad is making something using what is available. Jugaad, or improvising, is a very common Indian practice. Instead of using an oven, I used the microwave/convection oven. Instead of using white flour, I used almond flour. I omitted the vanilla extract. Instead of zesting the orange peel, I used a knife to cut it into tiny pieces. The cranberry orange scones were not quite as big and fluffy as usual, but they were tasty! Jugaad!

In other areas of my life I have used jugaad— here are just a few. In the kitchen: At home, I have a large variety of implements and utensils (grater, peeler, zester); a variety of knives; many pots, pans, and baking sheets; a toaster, blender, and mixer; and all kinds of spatulas and large spoons. Here I have one small knife; forks, spoons, and knives; one pot, one pan, and a bowl. That’s it! We make toast in the pan—it’s convenient to fry an egg on one side and toast bread on the other; if you don’t have a spatula, use a common table knife; get some exercise and beat your batter or cream by hand. I can make simple meals with what I have.


Technology: One classroom I use has no technology— no computer or projector. The other room, pictured at right, has computers that sometimes work.

There are ways to teach with technology without having technology in the classroom. No, that’s not antithetical. To use a PowerPoint in the classroom, I use Nearpod. It’s an app where students can view PowerPoints on their phones. They can also take polls (PollEverywhere) and quizzes (Kahoot or Socrative) on their phones, and contribute to word clouds (Answer Garden). Even if the power goes out, which it frequently does but usually not for very long, we can still access our phones. Once when I was teaching Research Methodology the power went out for about 45 minutes. I opened the doors to let the breeze cool us off, as the ceiling fans had stilled. My laptop still had power and I was connected to WiFi, so I held up my laptop and continued to teach. We don’t let small inconveniences like a lack of power stop us from teaching and learning!

My husband Bill and I have learned to practice jugaad in several other ways while living here in India (or just a simpler lifestyle): we wash our clothes by hand in a bucket; my hair gets a blow-dry on the rickshaw ride to school; if the power goes out our phones have a flashlight; paper clips can be used as screwdrivers; cold showers are refreshing; if you run out of bug spray, invite some lizards in, or turn up the AC and dive under the covers; if you can’t make copies of documents….. no, I draw the line there. I’m not going back to the days of monks and copying a document by hand 20 times! If all else fails, take a nap! Please add your own jugaad fixes in the comments below!

Thursday, May 5, 2022

Cats on a Hot Tin Roof

 


Cats on a hot tin roof; 

This is not a spoof. 

I caught them in the act, 

plodding without tact; 

no quiet creeping fog,

but sounds like a dropped log 

wake me at 6 a.m. 

an alarm I condemn.


Three small, thin, wastrel cats  

sleep on our roof on mats,

but before the sun rises

they start their surprises—

jumping, falling, leaping,

above our bodies sleeping;

our rest is interrupted;

our sleep is cut, abrupted.


After the cats, the birds

wake us without words—

the cuckoos call coo-ee

it’s morning, don’t you see?

Crows join the morning chorus,

caw, caw, caw —please join us—

reminds me of Dad’s ritual

in feeding crows was punctual.


If birds do not interrupt

my sleep, nor dreams disrupt,

dogs will inevitably

bark most capably.

It seems to be my fate

to not sleep in till 8.


If Indian sounds in the morn

from our lives were shorn—

would we regret the loss,

or then become less cross?

Would extra hours of sleep

make up for loss of peeps?

I cannot make a choice

to deprive of a voice,

animals, and birds that sing

a welcome to morning bring.


Vikram Seth’s Golden Gate inspired me to write in verse rather than prose for this blog post.

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Saree day and cultural appreciation (not appropriation)

      Thursday was Saree Day at Fergusson College. I draped my fancier saree and took an Uber Auto rickshaw to the college. The female students normally dressed in kurtas and leggings, or salwar kameez, or t-shirts and jeans, were now decked out in vibrant, sparkling sarees—shocking pink to pale purple to crimson red to cobalt blue (most a combination of the above!). The young ladies dazzled in their finery. Long, dangling gold earrings, elaborate nose rings, and necklaces gracing the forehead (bindi) completed the look. Bindis dotted the spot between eyebrows recently plucked or threaded. Young men and women took pictures outside—in pairs, groups, or alone. It looked like young people preparing to go to prom, but in India, there was no prom. There was, however, a raucous, exuberant dance party outside the following day.
      I admired all the finely-dressed students and joined in the picture-taking. Some of my students wanted to add a bindi to my forehead—when I asked what it signified I heard a variety of responses: wisdom; married status; belonging… to a husband, or to God; fashion statement; status alert; religious devotion. All my students were thrilled to see me in a saree, and everyone who talked to me had the same query: “did you drape it yourself?” asked one. “Did you tie it on by yourself?” asked the general. They were more impressed I could put it on properly than by the fact I wanted to wear it. And I did want to wear it. I enjoy wearing sarees—they make me feel beautiful! The housekeeper/cook at our Airbnb, in her limited but expressive English, pronounced me, “Indian! Nice.” 
      I ask myself, where is the line between cultural appreciation and cultural appropriation. All of my sarees were gifted to me by Indian girlfriends. All my students and colleagues smiled when they saw me in a saree. I appreciate many aspects of Indian culture, clothing, and food are at the top of the list. Cultural appropriation is “the unacknowledged or inappropriate adoption of the customs, practices, ideas, etc. of one people or society by members of another and typically more dominant people or society” (Wikipedia). Using this definition as a guide, I don’t think my use of Indian attire is appropriation. I hope my appreciation and acknowledgment of Indian beauty and customs are evident in my behavior and attitude. I was hesitant to wear the bindi as I somehow felt that was crossing a line from appreciation to appropriation—as maybe a nose ring would be for me. But where is the line, and how do we know if we’ve crossed it? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please comment below.

Sunday, March 20, 2022

People and Parrots

People and Parrots We are here in Pune, India, for my Fulbright Fellowship after a 2-year COVID delay. The Air India flight was as good as a 13-hour flight can be. The transfer in Delhi was a bit stressful as we didn’t know we had to go through Immigration and then come back in through security to board our flight to Pune. Once we arrived at the Pune airport, the hotel driver was right there waiting for us and we made the Ramee Grand Hotel our home for the week. The hotel was quiet and well equipped, but the best parts were the staff and the food. The exemplary staff met our every need, including having the driver take us to an office to get some money changed when we didn’t have success just showing up to a bank. The hotel is a short walk - maybe a kilometer (as it seems everything is just about a kilometer away, even if it isn’t!) from the college. Fergusson College Road (FC Road) is teeming with people, shops, auto-rickshaws, bicycles, cars, cabs, and more people. As in any big city, there were beggars—like NYC there are extremes in India, the poor and the rich cohabit the city. One unique experience was a short, older, Indian woman dressed in a simple saree holding a plate with flowers and colors (maybe for Holi), who walked beside me and then swiped her thumb upward on my forehead…whether in a blessing or a plea for me to purchase something, I’ll never know.
We were encouraged and blessed by the warm welcome we received at Fergusson College. A few days after our initial visit I met with students who expressed an interest in my two classes—Creative Writing and Research Methodology (something for the right brain and the left brain!). Then on Wednesday, we moved into our cottage for the duration in a lovely area of Pune, Aundh. The garden, replete with all kinds of birds I hope to soon identify, was the big selling point for me. The green parrot above was one of dozens, I’m not exaggerating, who live in the trees surrounding the Ramee Grand Hotel. When dusk falls, the parrots come out and fly around from treetop to treetop—an amazing sight. I won’t bore you with the numerous forms, FRRO, SIM card, and other technicalities we had to take care of this first week. All in all, it was a good start to our adventure in India. Stay tuned!

Thursday, September 16, 2021

Normalizing Interracial Relationships

 Fiction has many purposes—to entertain, instruct, expand the mind, change perspective, increase empathy, escape, travel, learn history, solve puzzles, learn about ourselves. Please add your own in the comments below - this list is far from exhaustive. I have found all these purposes at play in my own personal and professional reading. I gravitate toward fiction, but also enjoy the occasional memoir, biography, or history.

I recently read We Hope for Better Things, by Erin Bartels. It’s my favorite genre, historical fiction, covering a time and issue I cover in my historical novel Remnant, slavery in the United States. Bartels’ main characters find love across the color line. Interracial relationships are so common in her novel, they are almost expected. As I read through the reviews of We Hope for Better Things, I was struck by the paucity of comments on interracial relationships. One reviewer, Diane McPhail, writes “her striking protagonists, threaded together by unsuspected ties and deeply buried secrets, emerge as women of unusual strength, ability, and courage in the face of racial injustice. . . Each stands defiantly against cultural norms, in community, and in family, in the era in which they live.” McPhail skirts the issue of interracial relationships but doesn’t tackle it head-on. Very few reviewers mention the fact that the three main protagonists, women spanning three centuries, ALL engaged in interracial relationships. Wow! Isn’t that unusual! Or is it? 

Years ago, when I told my sister the plot of my novel Remnant, she pointed out that I had more than one interracial relationship and that stood out to her. At the time I didn’t even realize it! Of course, I knew my characters and I knew the men and women who formed relationships, but it didn’t strike me as odd or unusual that both my protagonists had interracial relationships. Why? Because interracial relationships are not unusual to me. They’re normal! I’m married interracially, and I know many interracial couples—all kinds of wonderful combinations: Black and White; Puerto Rican and biracial; African and Caucasian American; Chinese and Caucasian American; Indian and Caucasian American; Filipino and Italian; Filipino and African American… the list goes on. It feels like the most natural thing in the world to me. People are attracted to each other for many reasons, and race may or may not be a factor.

Wittingly or unwittingly, Bartels normalizes interracial relationships in We Hope for Better Things. I purposely normalize interracial relationships in Remnant. One of the powers of the written word is to change perspective, and I hope our novels change people’s minds about how ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ interracial relationships are—I think they’re normal!